From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sears v. McCoy

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 30, 2023
1:17-cv-00869 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2023)

Opinion

1:17-cv-00869

11-30-2023

RICHARD SEARS, Plaintiff v. DANTE MCCOY, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Yvette Kane, District Judge.

AND NOW, on this 30th day of November 2023, upon consideration of the docket in the above-captioned action, which reflects Plaintiff Richard Sears (“Plaintiff”)'s failure to prosecute, and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's surviving First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendant Dante McCoy (“Defendant McCoy”) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b);

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant McCoy and against Plaintiff on Plaintiff's state law tort claims, see (Doc. No. 62 ¶ 1(b)); and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Sears v. McCoy

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 30, 2023
1:17-cv-00869 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Sears v. McCoy

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SEARS, Plaintiff v. DANTE MCCOY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 30, 2023

Citations

1:17-cv-00869 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2023)