From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Searle v. San Antonio Hotel

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Oct 25, 1922
244 S.W. 571 (Tex. Civ. App. 1922)

Opinion

No. 6802.

October 25, 1922.

Appeal from Bexar County Court; McCollum Burnett, Judge.

Action by O. P. Searle, executor, against the San Antonio Hotel Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Appeal dismissed.

W. W. King, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Taliaferro, Cunningham Woursund and W. B. Jack Ball, all of San Antonio, for appellee.


The record in this cause was filed in this court on March 22, 1922, and nearly seven months thereafter was set for submission on October 18, 1922, and appellant given due and timely notice of the date for such submission. On October 14, about four days before the date of submission, a brief was filed in this court, none having been filed in the court below. On October 17, 1922, a motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by appellee because of failure to follow rules for briefing. No effort was made by appellant to follow any of the rules as to briefs.

No excuse has been offered for a failure to file a brief in this court, and, there being an inexcusable disregard of the law and rules, and appellee having demanded the enforcement of the rules, the motion will be sustained.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Searle v. San Antonio Hotel

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Oct 25, 1922
244 S.W. 571 (Tex. Civ. App. 1922)
Case details for

Searle v. San Antonio Hotel

Case Details

Full title:SEARLE v. SAN ANTONIO HOTEL CO

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: Oct 25, 1922

Citations

244 S.W. 571 (Tex. Civ. App. 1922)

Citing Cases

Dean v. Orton

It follows that the motion to dismiss must be sustained. Wall v. Solomon (Tex.Civ.App.) 259 S.W. 683;…