From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Searcy v. Strange

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0208-CG-N (S.D. Ala. Jan. 23, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0208-CG-N

01-23-2015

CARI D. SEARCY and KIMBERLY MCKEAND, individually and as parent and next friend of K.S., a minor, Plaintiffs, v. LUTHER STRANGE, in his capacity as Attorney General for the State of Alabama, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the court's order entered this date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT be and is hereby entered in favor plaintiffs, Cari D. Searcy and Kimberly McKeand and against defendant, Luther Strange, in his capacity as Attorney General for the State of Alabama.

ALA. CONST. ART. I, § 36.03 (2006) and ALA. CODE 1975 § 30-1-19 are hereby DECLARED to be unconstitutional because they violate they Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The defendant Luther Strange, in his capacity as Attorney General for the State of Alabama, is hereby ENJOINED from enforcing those laws. Costs are to be taxed against the defendant.

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of January, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Searcy v. Strange

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0208-CG-N (S.D. Ala. Jan. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Searcy v. Strange

Case Details

Full title:CARI D. SEARCY and KIMBERLY MCKEAND, individually and as parent and next…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0208-CG-N (S.D. Ala. Jan. 23, 2015)