Opinion
Civil Action 3:22-CV-2803-X-BN
04-19-2023
CANDACE SEARCY, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE, Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
BRANTLEY STARR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. [Doc. No. 19]. Searcy filed an objection in which she argued that her damages meet the amount in controversy standard. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made and reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and DISMISSES the suit for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.