From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Searcy v. City of N.Y.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 13, 2018
18cv8488 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2018)

Opinion

18cv8488 (JGK)

12-13-2018

IKIDA SEARCY, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:

On October 30, 2018, the plaintiff obtained a certificate of default against defendant Isidore Garcia. By letter dated November 7, 2018, defendant Garcia requested that the Court vacate the certificate of default and grant an extension of time to file an answer to the complaint. Defendant Garcia advises that he believed that his union was going to provide counsel to represent him in this action, and only recently discovered that such representation will not be provided. Defendant Garcia will now be proceeding pro se.

"[A]s a general rule a district court should grant a default judgment sparingly and grant leave to set aside the entry of default freely when the defaulting party is appearing pro se." Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993). Therefore, the certificate of default is vacated, (Dkt. No. 13), and the motion for default judgment is denied, (Dkt. No. 21).

Defendant Garcia's request for an extension of time to answer the complaint is granted. The defendant may answer the complaint by January 13, 2019.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York

December 13, 2018

/s/ _________

John G. Koeltl

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Searcy v. City of N.Y.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 13, 2018
18cv8488 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2018)
Case details for

Searcy v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:IKIDA SEARCY, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 13, 2018

Citations

18cv8488 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2018)