From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Searcy v. Battery Park City Auth.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 23, 2024
21-CV-3725 (JGLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2024)

Opinion

21-CV-3725 (JGLC)

01-23-2024

IDIKA SEARCY, Plaintiffs, v. BATTERY PARK CITY AUTHORITY, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JESSICA G. L. CLARKE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

The Court having been advised on January 23, 2024 that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within 30 days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline ; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis.

If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per Section 6(a) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are cancelled. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.


Summaries of

Searcy v. Battery Park City Auth.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 23, 2024
21-CV-3725 (JGLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Searcy v. Battery Park City Auth.

Case Details

Full title:IDIKA SEARCY, Plaintiffs, v. BATTERY PARK CITY AUTHORITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 23, 2024

Citations

21-CV-3725 (JGLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2024)