From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seaquist v. Caldier

Supreme Court of Washington.
Oct 3, 2019
193 Wash. 2d 1041 (Wash. 2019)

Opinion

No. 97327-0

10-03-2019

Larry SEAQUIST, et ux., Petitioners, v. Michelle CALDIER, Respondent.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its October 2, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Seaquist v. Caldier

Supreme Court of Washington.
Oct 3, 2019
193 Wash. 2d 1041 (Wash. 2019)
Case details for

Seaquist v. Caldier

Case Details

Full title:Larry SEAQUIST, et ux., Petitioners, v. Michelle CALDIER, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Oct 3, 2019

Citations

193 Wash. 2d 1041 (Wash. 2019)
449 P.3d 657

Citing Cases

Kivlin v. City of Bellevue

Although defamation and invasion of privacy by false light are distinct causes of action, they both “rest on…

In re JCK Legacy Co.

A claim for invasion of privacy by false light arises when someone publishes statements that place another…