From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seamon v. Minn. Dep't of Corrs.

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Nov 29, 2023
23-CV-3302 (JWB/JFD) (D. Minn. Nov. 29, 2023)

Opinion

23-CV-3302 (JWB/JFD)

11-29-2023

LEONARD-DERON SEAMON Living Private Man was held as Leonard Deron Seamon, person and/or Seamon, Leonard Deron, Plaintiff, v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PAUL SCHNELL, Commissioner, Official Capacity Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOHN F. DOCHERTY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In an order dated October 30, 2023, this Court ordered Mr. Seamon to pay an initial partial filing fee of $13.00 to commence this action. (Dkt. No. 4.) Mr. Seamon was given 21 days from the date of that Order, or until November 21, 2023, to pay the initial partial filing fee or submit additional financial information from which the initial partial filing fee could be recalculated, failing which it would be recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

That deadline has now passed, and Mr. Seamon has neither paid the initial partial filing fee nor submitted additional financial information from which this Court could recalculate his initial partial filing fee. In fact, Mr. Seamon has not communicated with this Court in any way since initiating this action. Accordingly, this Court now recommends, in accordance with its prior Order, that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. See Wewerka v. Roper, 431 Fed.Appx. 517, 517 (8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) following prisoner's failure to pay initial partial filing fee).

Based upon the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

NOTICE

Filing Objections: This Report and Recommendation is not an order or judgment of the District Court and is therefore not appealable directly to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Under Local Rule 72.2(b)(1), “a party may file and serve specific written objections to a magistrate judge's proposed finding and recommendations within 14 days after being served a copy” of the Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to those objections within 14 days after being served a copy of the objections. See Local Rule 72.2(b)(2). All objections and responses must comply with the word or line limits set forth in Local Rule 72.2(c).


Summaries of

Seamon v. Minn. Dep't of Corrs.

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Nov 29, 2023
23-CV-3302 (JWB/JFD) (D. Minn. Nov. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Seamon v. Minn. Dep't of Corrs.

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD-DERON SEAMON Living Private Man was held as Leonard Deron Seamon…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 29, 2023

Citations

23-CV-3302 (JWB/JFD) (D. Minn. Nov. 29, 2023)