From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seaman v. Sicklen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

March, 1927.


Judgment and order reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, for error in refusal to charge as requested at folio 229. Kelly P.J., Young and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Manning and Lazansky, JJ., dissent upon the ground that when plaintiff was authorized to procure a customer, and during a part of his negotiations to that end, he was not a licensed broker, and was guilty of a misdemeanor, and that no claim for commissions can arise out of such a situation, even if at the time he procured the customer he was a licensed broker.


Summaries of

Seaman v. Sicklen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Seaman v. Sicklen

Case Details

Full title:JOHN A. SEAMAN, Appellant, v. ANNA E. VAN SICKLEN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1927

Citations

219 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)