From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seaman v. McLaury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 8, 1909
134 App. Div. 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

Opinion

October 8, 1909.

Lavinia Lally, for the appellants.

John H. Corwin [ Walter Moffat with him on the brief], for the respondents.


It was error to direct a verdict for the defendants. The testatrix died in 1908, aged 88 years. Her alleged will was made in December, 1907. The testimony for the plaintiffs was abundant that for several years before her death she was bed-ridden and helpless, was fed with a spoon, had no control of her bodily functions, and had to be cared for in all details like a babe. Indeed, this was conceded on the trial. The evidence tended to show also that she was mentally feeble, peculiar and uncertain. The defendants called no witnesses except the lawyer who came to her abode and drew the will, and the two witnesses thereto whom he selected and brought with him without any apparent request from the testatrix or any one in her behalf to do so. He was a stranger to her, and it does not clearly appear how he was sent for, or that she caused him to be sent for. These three tell circumstantially what took place at the drawing and execution of the will, and their testimony would sustain the testamentary capacity of the testatrix, although it reveals that she was suspicious and odd. The will leaves $30,000 to the First Reformed Church of Yonkers, and $2,000 to the niece with whom she lived. This was substantially all of her estate. The next of kin of the testatrix were nephews and nieces. It was proved that she was on good terms with them and had frequently declared during the late years of her life that she would make no will as she did not want to prefer any of them. The testatrix was not a member of the said church. Its pastor had made frequent calls upon her.

The case was peculiarly one for the jury to say whether the testatrix had testamentary capacity.

The judgment should be reversed.

BURR, RICH and MILLER, JJ., concurred; JENKS, J., dissented.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.


Summaries of

Seaman v. McLaury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 8, 1909
134 App. Div. 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
Case details for

Seaman v. McLaury

Case Details

Full title:EMMA SEAMAN and Others, Infants, by ADELAIDE MOORE, Guardian ad Litem, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 8, 1909

Citations

134 App. Div. 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
118 N.Y.S. 809

Citing Cases

Seaman v. McLaury

It is not necessary, although it admits of discussion, to review in its entirety the evidence of testamentary…