From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seaman v. Focus on Renewal — Sto-Rox Neighborhood Corp.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 20, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-1014 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 20, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1014.

March 20, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On July 28, 2005, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On February 10, 2006, the magistrate judge issued a Report (Doc. 9) recommending that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) be denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, and the Defendants filed objections on February 27, 2006. See Doc. 10.

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, on this 20th day of March, 2006, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss ( Doc. 5) is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation dated February 10, 2006 is adopted as the opinion of the District Court.


Summaries of

Seaman v. Focus on Renewal — Sto-Rox Neighborhood Corp.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 20, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-1014 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 20, 2006)
Case details for

Seaman v. Focus on Renewal — Sto-Rox Neighborhood Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROSEMARY SUSAN SEAMAN, Plaintiff, v. FOCUS ON RENEWAL — STO-ROX…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 20, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-1014 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 20, 2006)