From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seaman v. De Noyelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 8, 1945
269 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

October 8, 1945.


Action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property. Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss the complaint, based on the ground that the contract on which the action is founded is unenforcible under the provisions of the Statute of Frauds (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 8). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. ( Tobias v. Lynch, 233 N.Y. 515; N.E.D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 246 N.Y. 40; Restatement, Contracts, § 207, clause (c), illustration 12.) Close, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seaman v. De Noyelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 8, 1945
269 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Seaman v. De Noyelle

Case Details

Full title:JAMES J. SEAMAN, Respondent, v. EDWARD K. DE NOYELLE et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 8, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)