From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seals-Bey v. Cross

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Aug 25, 2010
Civil Action No. 2:10cv74 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:10cv74.

August 25, 2010


ORDER


On July 23, 2010, Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert filed his Report and Recommendation, wherein the parties were directed, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), to file with the Clerk of Court any written objections within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed his objections on August 10, 2010.

Upon examination of the report from the Magistrate Judge, it appears to the Court that the issues raised by the petitioner in his Application for Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, were thoroughly considered by Magistrate Judge Seibert in his Report and Recommendation. Upon review of the petitioner's objections, the Court finds that the petitioner has not raised any issues that were not already considered and addressed by the Magistrate Judge in his Report and Recommendation. Moreover, the Court, upon an independent de novo consideration of all matters now before it, is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation accurately reflects the law applicable to the facts and circumstances before the Court in this action. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Seibert's Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is, accepted and that this civil action be disposed of in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Petitioner's Application for Habeas Corpus (Doc. 2) shall be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice and STRICKEN from the docket of this Court. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment for the respondent. It is further

ORDERED that, if a party should desire to appeal the decision of this Court, written notice of appeal must be received by the Clerk of this Court within thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the Judgment Order, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The $5.00 filing fee for the notice of appeal and the $450.00 docketing fee should also be submitted with the notice of appeal. In the alternative, at the time the notice of appeal is submitted, the petitioner may, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit a copy of this Order to all parties appearing herein.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Seals-Bey v. Cross

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Aug 25, 2010
Civil Action No. 2:10cv74 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Seals-Bey v. Cross

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM HENRY SEALS-BEY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN JAMES CROSS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Aug 25, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:10cv74 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2010)

Citing Cases

Seals-Bey v. Cross

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by…