From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seal4Safti, Inc. v. Cal. Expanded Metal Prods. Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 3, 2022
2:20-cv-10409-MCS-JEM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-10409-MCS-JEM

10-03-2022

SEAL4SAFTI, INC., Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS CO., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

MARK C. SCARSI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court, having conducted a jury trial, having resolved a bench trial, and having resolved post-trial motions, enters judgment as follows:

Judgment is entered against Plaintiff Seal4Safti, Inc. on all its claims. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant California Expanded Metal Products Co. on all its claims. Defendant shall take no monetary or injunctive relief. The Court will award costs and attorneys' fees to Defendant in a separate order. Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Seal4Safti, Inc. v. Cal. Expanded Metal Prods. Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 3, 2022
2:20-cv-10409-MCS-JEM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Seal4Safti, Inc. v. Cal. Expanded Metal Prods. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SEAL4SAFTI, INC., Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS CO.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 3, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-10409-MCS-JEM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2022)

Citing Cases

Nash-Perry v. City of Bakersfield

Genarlly, expert reports are generally inadmissible as hearsay, and Plaintiffs have failed to make any effort…

In re Cal. Expanded Metal Prods. Co.

. Subsequently, the district court denied CEMCO's request for a permanent injunction, J.A. 50-52, and set…