Opinion
C.A. No. 05C-07-009 (THG).
September 7, 2006.
David R. Hackett, Esquire, Griffin Hackett, P.A., Georgetown, DE.
Arthur L. Dent, Esquire, Sarah E. Diluzio, Esquire, Potter, Anderson Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE.
Dear Counsel:
Plaintiff has filed a timely motion to reargue the decision entered on August 23, 2006. The Defendant has timely responded.
The purpose of reargument is very limited. I am satisfied the decision takes into account each of your respective positions as to the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment.
The Motion to Reargue is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Yours very truly,
T. Henley Graves