From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seabury v. City of New York

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 21, 2006
06-CV-0807 (ERK) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2006)

Opinion

06-CV-0807 (ERK).

March 21, 2006


JUDGMENT


A Memorandum and Order of Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge, having been filed on March 21, 2006, dismissing the complaint as frivolous pursuant to Fitzgerald v. First East Seventh Street Tenants Corp., 221 F.3d 362, 364 (2d Cir 2000) (per curiam); and denying as moot defendant's request the time to respond to the complaint until April 16, 2006; it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that plaintiff take nothing of the defendant; that the complaint is dismissed; and that defendant's request to extend the time to respond to the complaint until April 16, 2006 is denied as moot.


Summaries of

Seabury v. City of New York

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 21, 2006
06-CV-0807 (ERK) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Seabury v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:RAHSAAN A. SEABURY, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Mar 21, 2006

Citations

06-CV-0807 (ERK) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2006)

Citing Cases

Seabury v. New York City

Each of the three cases have been dismissed and judgment has entered against plaintiff. See Seabury v. City…