From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seabrook v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 7, 2000
762 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 99-2117

Opinion filed July 7, 2000 JANUARY TERM 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, Hale R. Stancil, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


UPON MOTION FOR REHEARING

The appellant has moved for rehearing requesting that we withdraw our previous decision in view of our decision in Rice, et al. v. State, Case Number 5D99-1513 in which the constitutionality of section 893.13(1)(e)1, Florida Statutes (1997), was upheld. We note Rice is now on appeal to the Florida Supreme Court. Since the same statute is challenged in the instant appeal, we grant the motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous decision and now affirm per curiam on the authority of Rice.

SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seabrook v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 7, 2000
762 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Seabrook v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARBLEE SEABROOK, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 7, 2000

Citations

762 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)