From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southeasr Alaska Conservation Council v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 31, 2009
580 F.3d 873 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 06-35679.

August 31, 2009.

Thomas S. Waldo, Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, Inc., Juneau, AK, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Aaron P. Avila, John T. Stahr, Lane McFadden, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Mark A. Nitczynski, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Denver, CO, Richard L. Pomeroy, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Defendants-Appellees.

John C. Berghoff, Jr., Mayer Brown, LLP, Chicago, IL, Robert A. Maynard, Perkins Coie, LLP, Boise, ID, Matthew D. McGill, Theodore B. Olson, Gibson Dunn Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, David C. Crosby, David C. Crosby, P.C., Juneau, AK, Ruth Hamilton Heese, AGAK-Office of the Alaska Attorney General, Juneau, AK, Cameron M. Leonard, AGAK-Office of the Alaska Attorney General, Fairbanks, AK, for Defendant-intervenors-Appellees.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. CV-05-00012-J-JKS, District of Alaska, Juneau.

Before: PROCTER HUG, JR., A. WALLACE TASHIMA and SUSAN P. GRABER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 486 F.3d 638 (9th Cir. 2007), reversed and remanded by ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 2458, 174 L.Ed.2d 193 (2009). We, in turn, remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.


Summaries of

Southeasr Alaska Conservation Council v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 31, 2009
580 F.3d 873 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Southeasr Alaska Conservation Council v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL; Sierra Club; Lynn Canal…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 31, 2009

Citations

580 F.3d 873 (9th Cir. 2009)