Opinion
22 Civ. 760 (AT)
10-04-2022
S.D. and J.D., Plaintiffs, v. EMBLEMHEALTH PLAN, INC.; CIGNA CORPORATION; EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY; EXPRESS SCRIPTS PHARMACY, INC. and JOHN DOE, a fictitious name, real name unknown, intended to be the individuals or entityies which unlawfully interfered with Plaintiff s rights, as set forth below, Defendants.
ORDER
ANALISA TORRES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
The Court has reviewed the parties' letter dated October 3, 2022. ECF No. 35. The parties state that they “do not feel [m]ediation will be fruitful as there are fundamental disagreements as to liability of the defendants” and suggest that the action proceed with motion practice. Id. at 1. The case management plan requires that the parties select one of three options for ADR, ECF No. 28 ¶ 10(b), and recommend a timeline for one of those options, id. ¶ 10(c). The parties have not done so. Accordingly, by October 7, 2022, the parties shall file a joint letter stating their position on ADR. Id. ¶14.
SO ORDERED.