From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scully v. Rosanoff

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Jul 23, 1940
40 Cal.App.2d 249 (Cal. Ct. App. 1940)

Opinion

Docket No. 12741.

July 23, 1940.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Appeal dismissed on motion.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

A. Brigham Rose, Paul Angelillo and Lucian A. Sauvage for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney-General, and Alberta Belford, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] The respondents having served and filed their motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this court, and it appearing that more than five months have elapsed since the filing of the notice of appeal, and it appearing that the notice of appeal was filed on the 29th day of December, 1939, and that no notice to prepare the clerk's transcript has been filed, and that no transcript has been filed,

It is hereby ordered that this appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed.


Summaries of

Scully v. Rosanoff

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Jul 23, 1940
40 Cal.App.2d 249 (Cal. Ct. App. 1940)
Case details for

Scully v. Rosanoff

Case Details

Full title:FRANK SCULLY, Appellant, v. AARON J. ROSANOFF, Director of the Department…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Jul 23, 1940

Citations

40 Cal.App.2d 249 (Cal. Ct. App. 1940)
104 P.2d 706

Citing Cases

Levin v. Levin

Rule 5(a) of Rules on Appeal for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal requires that an appellant…