From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scuba Plus Sky, Ltd. v. Partridge Place

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1994
201 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 1, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Toker, J.).


The conclusory affidavit of defendant's attorney is insufficient to establish the necessary adequate defense on the merits pursuant to CPLR 5015 (see, Keeffe v. Emory, 59 A.D.2d 856, 857). We therefore conclude that the IAS Court's refusal to vacate the entry of default was not an improvident exercise of discretion.

The appellant's additional arguments have been considered and rejected.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Wallach and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Scuba Plus Sky, Ltd. v. Partridge Place

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1994
201 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Scuba Plus Sky, Ltd. v. Partridge Place

Case Details

Full title:SCUBA PLUS SKY, LTD., Respondent, v. PARTRIDGE PLACE CORP., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 826

Citing Cases

Commercial Sites v. Prestige Photo Studios

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the Supreme Court's refusal to vacate their default in failing to…

Commercial Sites v. Prestige Photo Studios

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the Supreme Court's refusal to vacate their default in failing to…