From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scruggs v. Vance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2012
No. 2:06-cv-0633 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:06-cv-0633 KJN P

09-19-2012

ARTAY SCRUGGS, Plaintiff, v. VANCE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On September 19, 2012, Brian M. Rothschild, one of the attorneys for plaintiff, filed a request to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff because he is no longer an attorney with the Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP ("Akin Gump") law firm. Joanna H. Kim and Hyongsoon Kim would continue their representation of plaintiff in this action. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The September 19, 2012 request (dkt. no. 234) is granted; Brian M. Rothschild is relieved as counsel of record for plaintiff;

2. Joanna H. Kim and Hyongsoon Kim of the law firm "Akin Gump" shall continue to represent plaintiff in this action; and

3. The Clerk of the Court shall change the court records accordingly.

____________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Scruggs v. Vance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2012
No. 2:06-cv-0633 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Scruggs v. Vance

Case Details

Full title:ARTAY SCRUGGS, Plaintiff, v. VANCE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2012

Citations

No. 2:06-cv-0633 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2012)