From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scruggs v. S. Vance

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 19, 2008
No. CIV S-06-0633 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0633 FCD DAD P.

February 19, 2008


ORDER


On January 14, 2008, plaintiff filed several discovery documents, including requests for admissions and requests for production of documents. Plaintiff is informed that court permission is not necessary for discovery requests and that neither discovery requests served on an opposing party nor that party's responses should be filed until such time as a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties shall not be filed with the court unless, and until, they are at issue.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 14, 2008 requests for admissions and request for production of documents will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Scruggs v. S. Vance

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 19, 2008
No. CIV S-06-0633 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Scruggs v. S. Vance

Case Details

Full title:ARTAY SCRUGGS, Plaintiff, v. S. VANCE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 19, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0633 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2008)