Summary
In Scroggins I, although the district court declared in its ruling on the new trial motion that it had "already determined in open court that the testimony Young and Thomas were to provide is material," we found that "it did not make any other reference to its materiality determination or to findings upon which it based its conclusion that their testimony was material."
Summary of this case from U.S. v. ScrogginsOpinion
No. 04-6970.
January 24, 2005.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari Granted — Reversed and Remanded. (See No. 04-394) ante, P. 447.).
Certiorari Granted — Vacated and Remanded.
Reported below: 379 F. 3d 233;