From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scrivener v. Bryant

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Jan 17, 2024
Civ. 24-004-RAW-GLJ (E.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 2024)

Opinion

Civ. 24-004-RAW-GLJ

01-17-2024

JOSHUA LEE SCRIVENER, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS BRYANT, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

RONALD A. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting the Court to appoint counsel (Dkt. 3). He bears the burden of convincing the Court that his claim has sufficient merit to warrant such appointment. McCarthy v. Weinberg, 753 F.2d 836, 838 (10th Cir. 1985) (citing United States v. Masters, 484 F.2d 1251, 1253 (10th Cir. 1973)). The Court has carefully reviewed the merits of Plaintiff's claims, the nature of factual issues raised in his allegations, and his ability to investigate crucial facts. McCarthy, 753 F.2d at 838 (citing Maclin v. Freake, 650 F.2d 885, 887-88 (7th Cir. 1981)). After considering Plaintiff's ability to present his claims and the complexity of the legal issues raised by the claims, the Court finds that appointment of counsel is not warranted. See Williams v. Meese, 926 F.2d 994, 996 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Rucks v. Boergermann, 57 F.3d 978, 979 (10th Cir. 1995).

ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. 3) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Scrivener v. Bryant

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Jan 17, 2024
Civ. 24-004-RAW-GLJ (E.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Scrivener v. Bryant

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA LEE SCRIVENER, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS BRYANT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 17, 2024

Citations

Civ. 24-004-RAW-GLJ (E.D. Okla. Jan. 17, 2024)