From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scozzari v. United Distillers Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

January, 1928


Order, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Defendant, having elected to rescind the contract upon plaintiff's default, must return to plaintiff the amount he paid thereon. ( Muller Co. v. Effangee Tobacco Co., 190 App. Div. 808; affd., 229 N.Y. 594.) Our former decision in 217 Appellate Division, 755, related to an examination of defendant by plaintiff to enable him to frame his complaint and was based upon an entirely different record. We cannot consider the record on that appeal upon the appeal now before us. We are confined solely to a consideration of the allegations of the complaint and must determine whether it states a cause of action. In our opinion it does. Young, Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scozzari v. United Distillers Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Scozzari v. United Distillers Company

Case Details

Full title:GUISEPPE SCOZZARI, Appellant, v. UNITED DISTILLERS COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1928

Citations

222 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)