From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Syngen, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
May 26, 2015
2:15-cv-00142-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2015)

Opinion

          STIPULATION FOR THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED ORDER IN LIGHT OF PARTIES' INTERIM RESOLUTION (L.R. 144)

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Plaintiff SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY ("Plaintiff") and Defendants SYNGEN, INC., PHILIP COELHO, PRINCE EMMANUEL, and TERRENCE WOLF ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

         WHEREAS, on January 16, 2015, Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action;

         WHEREAS, on February 6, 2015, Plaintiff served Defendants with a copy of the Complaint and Summons in a Civil Action;

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), Defendants initially needed to file and serve a response to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before April 7, 2015;

         WHEREAS, the parties have now agreed in principle to an interim resolution of all issues raised in Plaintiff's Complaint that includes an agreement to stay this action pending final resolution of the underlying litigation, and the parties are currently finalizing a written interim resolution agreement, as well as a stipulation and proposed order staying this action;

          Mary E. McCutcheon, Tyler C. Gerking, Farella Braun + Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, SYNGEN, INC.

          KAUFMAN DOLOWICH & VOLUCK, LLP, Louis H. Castoria, Attorneys for Plaintiff, SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY.

          WHEREAS, on April 3, 2015, the parties stipulated to an initial 21-day extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to and including April 28, 2015 pursuant to

          WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to a further extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to and including May 26, 2015 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144;

          WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint by an additional 7 days to allow them to finalize the interim resolution agreement and stipulation and proposed order for stay;

          WHEREAS, this is the parties' third stipulation to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint;


         NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND STIPULATE THAT Defendants shall have to and including June 2, 2015, to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Syngen, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
May 26, 2015
2:15-cv-00142-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2015)
Case details for

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Syngen, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Plaintiff, v. SYNGEN…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: May 26, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-00142-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2015)