Opinion
Civil Action 1:22-CV-02313
11-28-2022
PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT (AMENDED)
Hon. Lewis J. Liman, United States District Judge
This matter came before the Court on motion for Default Judgment of Plaintiff, Scottsdale Insurance Company, as successor in interest to Western Heritage Insurance Company, (“Scottsdale”) as against Defendant Zolo Services Corp. (“Zolo”) under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 55.1 for failure to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint in this action.
NOW, for the reasons stated on the record and upon concluding that Defendant failed to answer or otherwise appear in this action and that Plaintiff obtained a certificate of default from the Clerk of this Court, it is
ORDERED that default judgment is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Zolo under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 55.1 and that it is ADJUDGED, DECLARED AND DECREED that:
(1) The Scottsdale Policy does not provide any coverage to Zolo for the subject property losses at the Premises;
(2) Scottsdale owes no duty to indemnify Zolo for claims asserted in the Fireman's Fund Subrogation Action;
(3) As of the date hereof, Scottsdale owes no further duty to defend Zolo in the Fireman's Fund Subrogation Action; and
(4) As of the date hereof, Scottsdale be permitted to withdraw its defense of Zolo in the Fireman's Fund Subrogation Action.
SO ORDERED.