From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Stofko

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 14, 2022
5:21-cv-03904 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 14, 2022)

Opinion

5:21-cv-03904

06-14-2022

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KASEY STOFKO, KUTZTOWN MOBILE HOME PARK, LLC, NICHOLAS PRIKIS, and SOPHIE PITTAS, Defendants.


ORDER

JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2022, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, the Plaintiff's response, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Motion, ECF No. 23, is GRANTED as to the duty to defend;

2. The Motion, ECF No. 23, is DENIED as to the duty to indemnify;

3. The Complaint for Declaratory Relief, ECF No. 1, is dismissed without prejudice; and

4. This case is CLOSED.


Summaries of

Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Stofko

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 14, 2022
5:21-cv-03904 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Stofko

Case Details

Full title:SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KASEY STOFKO, KUTZTOWN MOBILE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 14, 2022

Citations

5:21-cv-03904 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 14, 2022)