From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Sherrod

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Jun 3, 2021
CAUSE NO.: 2:20-CV-224-PPS-JEM (N.D. Ind. Jun. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-CV-224-PPS-JEM

06-03-2021

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. STEPHAN SHERROD, et al., Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 636(B)(3) AND LOCAL RULE 72-1

JOHN E. MARTIN MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

This matter is before the Court on a Suggestion of Death [DE 22], filed by Defendant Riddle on January 7, 2021. Riddle represents that Defendant Stephan Sherrod died on December 24, 2020. At a hearing on June 3, 2021, the remaining parties who have appeared in the case represented that no motion to substitute has been filed or will be filed.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a) provides,
If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent's successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). The Court finds that the Notice of Death was properly served on the parties in accordance with Rule 25(c) and more than 90 days has passed. No. motion for substitution has been filed.

Accordingly, the Court hereby RECOMMENDS that the District Court DISMISS Defendant Stephan Sherrod from the case without prejudice.

This Report and Recommendation is submitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties shall have fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Recommendation to file written objections thereto with the Clerk of Court. The failure to file a timely objection will result in the waiver of the right to challenge this Recommendation before either the District Court or the Court of Appeals. Willis v. Caterpillar, Inc., 199 F.3d 902, 904 (7th Cir. 1999); Hunger v. Leininger, 15 F.3d 664, 668 (7th Cir. 1994); Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260-261 (7th Cir. 1989).

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Sherrod

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Jun 3, 2021
CAUSE NO.: 2:20-CV-224-PPS-JEM (N.D. Ind. Jun. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Sherrod

Case Details

Full title:SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. STEPHAN SHERROD, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Jun 3, 2021

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 2:20-CV-224-PPS-JEM (N.D. Ind. Jun. 3, 2021)