From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Kinsale Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 10, 2023
2:22-cv-01203-JAD (D. Nev. Jul. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01203-JAD

07-10-2023

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1-20 inclusive, Defendants. KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant.

NICOLAIDES FINK THORPE MICHAELIDES SULLIVAN LLP Timothy P. Kitt Dane A. Littlefield Todd R. Alexander Attorneys for Defendant / Third-Party Plaintiff Kinsale Insurance Company SELMAN LEICHENGER EDSON HSU NEWMAN MOORE LLP David A. Astengo Attorneys for Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company CARMAN COONEY FORSBUSH PLLC Benjamin J. Carman Robert T. Hernandez Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant Employers Mutual Casualty Company


NICOLAIDES FINK THORPE MICHAELIDES SULLIVAN LLP Timothy P. Kitt Dane A. Littlefield Todd R. Alexander Attorneys for Defendant / Third-Party Plaintiff Kinsale Insurance Company

SELMAN LEICHENGER EDSON HSU NEWMAN MOORE LLP David A. Astengo Attorneys for Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company

CARMAN COONEY FORSBUSH PLLC Benjamin J. Carman Robert T. Hernandez Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant Employers Mutual Casualty Company

JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

ECF NO. 25

JENNIFER A. DORSEY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Kinsale Insurance Company, and Third-Party Defendant Employers Mutual Casualty Company, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby jointly agree and stipulate to the dismissal of the above captioned action with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. The parties jointly move the Court to dismiss the action with prejudice. The parties have resolved their dispute by settlement.

The parties request that the court reserve jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement pursuant to Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 378, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 1675-1676 (1994); Hagestad v. Tragesser, 49 F.3d 1430, 1432 (9th Cir. 1995).

Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i) regarding signatures, David Astengo hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document and its content has been obtained by all signatories listed. ORDER

Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 25] and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.


Summaries of

Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Kinsale Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 10, 2023
2:22-cv-01203-JAD (D. Nev. Jul. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Kinsale Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, and…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 10, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01203-JAD (D. Nev. Jul. 10, 2023)