From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Dec 11, 2014
Case No. 4:14cv421-MW/CAS (N.D. Fla. Dec. 11, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 4:14cv421-MW/CAS

12-11-2014

NAY'LOR SCOTT, #189115, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an Order filed October 24, 2014, Plaintiff was directed to either (1) file a motion for leave to file in forma pauperis, or (2) pay the filing fee, or (3) file a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action by November 21, 2014. Plaintiff was specifically warned that a recommendation would be made that this case would be dismissed if he did not comply with that order. Doc. 10. To date, no response has been received from the Plaintiff.

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S. Ct. 1386, 8 L. Ed. 2d 734 (1962); Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44, 111 S. Ct. 2123, 2132, 115 L. Ed. 2d 27 (1991). Also, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 (11th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989), and cases cited; Phipps v. Blakeney, 8 F.3d 788, 790 (11th Cir. 1993). Plaintiff did not comply with a court order or prosecute this case. This action should now be dismissed.

Plaintiff shall have a 14 day period after service of this Report and Recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final opportunity to show good cause for his failure to respond. Alternatively, Plaintiff may also file a "motion for reconsideration" which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on December 11, 2014.

s/ Charles A. Stampelos

CHARLES A. STAMPELOS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.


Summaries of

Scott v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Dec 11, 2014
Case No. 4:14cv421-MW/CAS (N.D. Fla. Dec. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Scott v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:NAY'LOR SCOTT, #189115, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 11, 2014

Citations

Case No. 4:14cv421-MW/CAS (N.D. Fla. Dec. 11, 2014)