From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jun 20, 1988
543 A.2d 346 (D.C. 1988)

Opinion

Nos. 85-206, 86-423 and F6849-84.

June 20, 1988.

James Klein, Public Defender Service, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Michael W. Farrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., for U.S.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, [*]ROGERS, [*]STEADMAN, and SCHWELB, Associate Judges.

Associate Judge BELSON has recused himself from these cases.

Associate Judge SCHWELB did not participate in these cases.


ORDER


On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division[*] that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of December 4, 1987, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before June 30, 1988.


Summaries of

Scott v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jun 20, 1988
543 A.2d 346 (D.C. 1988)
Case details for

Scott v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Monroe W. SCOTT, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 20, 1988

Citations

543 A.2d 346 (D.C. 1988)

Citing Cases

Stratmon v. U.S.

The resentencing, of course, would take place before a different judge, since by that time Judge Murphy had…

Harper v. U.S.

Id., 157 U.S.App.D.C. at 226-227, 483 F.2d at 1229-30 (footnotes omitted). See Scott v. United States, 536…