Opinion
November, 1924.
Judgment and order reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. All concur, except Cochrane, P.J., and H.T. Kellogg, J., dissenting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Scott v. United Traction Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1924
211 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Summaries of
Scott v. United Traction Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1924
211 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for
Scott v. United Traction Company
Case Details
Full title:EDWIN W. SCOTT, Respondent, v. UNITED TRACTION COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1924
Citations
211 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)