Summary
holding claim qualified as second or successive under application of past circuit precedent, but expressing doubt that it was the correct decision and concern that such a result could qualify as a suspension of the writ of habeas corpus
Summary of this case from Mandacina v. KallisOpinion
No. 18–6783.
01-07-2019
Gino Velez SCOTT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.