From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Trogden

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1966
151 S.E.2d 18 (N.C. 1966)

Opinion

Filed 23 November, 1966.

Trial 48 — The action of the trial court in setting aside the verdict in its discretion will not be disturbed on appeal when the record fails to disclose any abuse of discretion.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Riddle, Special Judge, April 1966 Civil Session of RANDOLPH.

Ottway Burton for plaintiff appellant.

Coltrane Gavin for defendant appellee.


Plaintiff instituted this action March 8, 1965. He alleged he sustained property damage of $350.00 and damages of $10,000.00 on account of personal injuries as the result of a rear-end collision on August 10, 1963, caused by defendant's negligence. Answering, defendant admitted his car struck the rear of plaintiff's car and that his negligence was the sole proximate cause of the collision. He admitted there was some (but not extensive) damage to plaintiff's 1950 Dodge but denied plaintiff received any personal injuries.

Plaintiff and defendant offered evidence relating to the amount of damages plaintiff had sustained as a result of the collision.

The court submitted, and the jury answered, the following issues: "1. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff, James Wayman Scott, Sr., entitled to recover of the defendant, Earl Walton Trogdon, Jr., for: a) Property damage? ANSWER: $325.00. b) Personal injuries? ANSWER: $10,000.00.'

The court, allowing defendant's motion, "ORDERED, in the discretion of the Court, that the verdict of the jury in this trial be set aside and that a new trial be held in this action." (Our italics.)

Plaintiff excepted and appealed.


"(W)hen a trial court sets aside a verdict in its discretion, as here, its action in so doing is not subject to review by appeal to the Supreme Court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion. Walston v. Greene, 246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E.2d 805; Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E.2d 377; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N.C. 488, 42 S.E. 936; Brink v. Black, 74 N.C. 329." Goldston v. Wright, 257 N.C. 279, 125 S.E.2d 462.

Here, as in Goldston, the record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. The appeal is without substance and will be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Scott v. Trogden

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1966
151 S.E.2d 18 (N.C. 1966)
Case details for

Scott v. Trogden

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WAYMAN SCOTT, SR. v. EARL WALTON TROGDON, JR

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1966

Citations

151 S.E.2d 18 (N.C. 1966)
151 S.E.2d 18

Citing Cases

Worthington v. Bynum

In sum, it is plain that a trial judge's discretionary order pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 59 for or against a…

Goldston v. Chambers

" We have held repeatedly since 1820 in case after case, and no principle is more fully settled in this…