From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Treon

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jun 15, 2006
No. 02-05-446-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2006)

Opinion

No. 02-05-446-CV.

Delivered: June 15, 2006.

Appeal from the 78th District Court of Wichita County.

Panel D: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On May 18, 2006, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(f).


Summaries of

Scott v. Treon

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jun 15, 2006
No. 02-05-446-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Scott v. Treon

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SCOTT, Appellants v. WARDEN R. TREON, ASST. WARDEN J. MOONEYHAM…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jun 15, 2006

Citations

No. 02-05-446-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2006)