From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 28, 2022
646 S.W.3d 746 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84432

06-28-2022

Cardell SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Jeffrey C. Esparza, for Appellant Zeb Charlton, for Respondent


Jeffrey C. Esparza, for Appellant

Zeb Charlton, for Respondent

Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM: Cardell Scott appeals from the judgment of the motion court, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 24.035 motion seeking to set aside his guilty plea to murder in the second degree, one count of endangering the welfare of a child, and two counts of armed criminal action. In his sole point on appeal, Scott argues that his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by making affirmative representations ultimately causing his guilty pleas to be entered unknowingly and involuntarily. The judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 28, 2022
646 S.W.3d 746 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Scott v. State

Case Details

Full title:Cardell SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jun 28, 2022

Citations

646 S.W.3d 746 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)