From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Feb 28, 2020
291 So. 3d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-2703

02-28-2020

Frank D. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Frank D. Scott, South Bay, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Frank D. Scott, South Bay, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to all issues raised on appeal finding them to be meritless.

Because it appears that Appellant's postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further similarly inappropriate pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 199 l-CF-4660, may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019) ; State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999).

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scott v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Feb 28, 2020
291 So. 3d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Scott v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANK D. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 28, 2020

Citations

291 So. 3d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)