From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. South Carolina

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 14, 2009
343 F. App'x 864 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-6598.

Submitted: September 10, 2009.

Decided: September 14, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. William M. Catoe, Jr., Magistrate Judge. (6:08-cv-01684-GRA).

Wanda Scott, Appellant Pro Se. James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Wanda Scott appeals the district court's order denying her motion for waiver of PACER fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. South Carolina, No. 6:08-cv-01684-GRA, 2009 WL 750419 (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Scott v. South Carolina

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 14, 2009
343 F. App'x 864 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Scott v. South Carolina

Case Details

Full title:Wanda SCOTT, a/k/a Wanda Ranae Scott Thomas, Petitioner-Appellant, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 14, 2009

Citations

343 F. App'x 864 (4th Cir. 2009)