From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1998
249 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 13, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the court did not err, under the facts of this case, in instructing the jury with respect to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur ( see, Dermatossian v. New York City Tr. Auth., 67 N.Y.2d 219; Myron v. Millar El. Indus., 182 A.D.2d 658; Liebman v. Otis El. Co., 127 A.D.2d 745).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Miller, J.P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scott v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1998
249 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Scott v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA SCOTT, Respondent, v. ROCHDALE VILLAGE, INC., Appellant. (And a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 777