Scott v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Full title: TERRY LEE SCOTT, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 6, 2017

2015-3210 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2017)

Opinion

2015-3210

04-06-2017

TERRY LEE SCOTT, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Intervenor

KENNAN GEORGE DANDAR, Dandar & Dandar, P.A., Tampa, FL, argued for petitioner. ERIC JOHN SINGLEY, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., CLAUDIA BURKE. KATHERINE M. SMITH, Office of the General Counsel, United States Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC for respondent. Also represented by BRYAN G. POLISUK.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT-0752-15-0097-I-1.

JUDGMENT

KENNAN GEORGE DANDAR, Dandar & Dandar, P.A., Tampa, FL, argued for petitioner. ERIC JOHN SINGLEY, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., CLAUDIA BURKE. KATHERINE M. SMITH, Office of the General Counsel, United States Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC for respondent. Also represented by BRYAN G. POLISUK. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, CLEVENGER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 6, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court