From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Mcclung

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 24, 1916
112 N.E. 1076 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued February 3, 1916

Decided March 24, 1916

Graham Witschief, Corporation Counsel ( John B. Corwin of counsel), for appellants.

Howard Thornton, W.F. Cassedy and J.B. Scott for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that according to the findings unanimously affirmed there was a change of grade; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN, CARDOZO and SEABURY, JJ.


Summaries of

Scott v. Mcclung

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 24, 1916
112 N.E. 1076 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Scott v. Mcclung

Case Details

Full title:J. BRADLEY SCOTT et al., Respondents, v . BENJAMIN McCLUNG, as Mayor of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 24, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 1076 (N.Y. 1916)
112 N.E. 1076