From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Larabell

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 3, 2007
Case No. 1:06-cv-557 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 3, 2007)

Summary

summarizing Cox holding

Summary of this case from Scheid v. Penrose

Opinion

Case No. 1:06-cv-557.

April 3, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This is a civil rights action brought pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 15, 2007, Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville issued a report and recommendation (docket #20) recommending that defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) motion (docket # 14) be granted and that plaintiff's amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice because it is barred by the statute of limitations. The matter is now before the court for de novo review on plaintiff's objections to the report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

Plaintiff's complaint is based on a parole eligibility report defendant Larabell wrote on April 29, 2003, which described plaintiff as being "`manipulative and argumentative' with prison personnel." The report and recommendation gave plaintiff the benefit of a "deemed" filing date of August 3, 2006, even though plaintiff's complaint was not actually filed until August 10, 2006, when the court granted plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The deemed filing date of August 3, 2006, is months after the expiration of the three-year limitations period.

The magistrate judge found that plaintiff had not carried his burden of demonstrating an entitlement to tolling of the statute of limitations. Plaintiff's objections (docket # 21) claim entitlement to tolling pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) and equitable tolling. The report and recommendation correctly found that the "foundational flaw" in the former argument is that section 1997e(a) does not apply to complaints filed by former prisoners. (docket # 20 at 5-6). The latter claim of entitlement to equitable tolling is equally meritless for the reasons specified in the report and recommendation. ( Id. at 6-7).

Conclusion

Upon de novo review, plaintiff's objections will be overruled, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation will be adopted, defendant's motion will be granted, and plaintiff's amended complaint will be dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Scott v. Larabell

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 3, 2007
Case No. 1:06-cv-557 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 3, 2007)

summarizing Cox holding

Summary of this case from Scheid v. Penrose
Case details for

Scott v. Larabell

Case Details

Full title:DAVID J. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. M. LARABELL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 3, 2007

Citations

Case No. 1:06-cv-557 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 3, 2007)

Citing Cases

Scheid v. Penrose

released and is no longer a prisoner does not have to satisfy the PLRA's exhaustion requirements before…

Jones v. Unknown D.O.C. Bus Driver

Other district courts to have addressed the issue have arrived at the same conclusion. SeeRobertson v. Shelby…