From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 27, 2009
No. CIV S-08-0979-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-0979-LKK-CMK-P.

August 27, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 27, 2008, respondents filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 18) the petition as untimely. On August 21, 2009, the court issued an order rejecting respondents' argument and concluding that ". . . petitioner's petition was timely filed." Respondents will be directed to file an answer to the petition within 30 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Doc. 18 as a pending motion.

The court notes that another motion remains pending on the court's docket — petitioner's motion (Doc. 29) to file amended objections to the January 5, 2009, findings and recommendations. In that the amended objections were filed on May 15, 2009, and were considered by the court prior to issuance of the August 21, 2009, order, petitioner's motion is granted, nunc pro tunc.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's motion (Doc. 29) to file amended objections is granted, nunc pro tunc;

2. Pursuant to the court's August 21, 2009, order, respondents' motion to dismiss (Doc. 18) is denied; and

3. Respondents shall file an answer to the petition within 60 days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Scott v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 27, 2009
No. CIV S-08-0979-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2009)
Case details for

Scott v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE SCOTT, Petitioner, v. M.C. KRAMER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 27, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-08-0979-LKK-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2009)