Opinion
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California, MISHA D. IGRA, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, MARTHA P. EHLENBACH, Deputy Attorney General Sacramento, CA Attorneys for Defendants Moser and Wagner
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND THE PRETRIAL ORDER TO CORRECT A MISIDENTIFIED DEFENSE WITNESS
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This case is set for trial on December 14-17, 2015, in Sacramento. (ECF No. 164.) Defense counsel discovered that, in the Joint-Pretrial Order, Officer Campbell was misidentified as a defense witness and misnamed in the statement of the parties' admitted facts. (ECF No. 164 at 7:1-2, 12:15.) Defendants intended to name Officer Cunningham as a witness and in the statement of facts. The parties stipulate that the Court may issue an order amending the Joint-Pretrial Order to name the correct individual.
STIPULATION
The parties, having met and conferred, hereby stipulate that the Court may amend the Joint-Pretrial Order to list Offi cer Cunningham as a defense witness in place of Offi cer Campbell. (ECF No. 164 at 12: 15.) The parties further stipulate that Officer Cunningham replaces Offi cer Campbell in the parties' list of admitted facts. ( Id. at 7:1-2.)
SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, the Joint-Pretrial Order is amended to identify Officer Cunningham as a defense witness in place of Officer Campbell. (ECF No. 164 at 12:15.) And, the parties' list of admitted facts in the order is amended to name Officer Cunningham in place of Officer Campbell on page 7, lines one and two.
IT IS SO ORDERED.