From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Greater Anoka Cty. Humane Society

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 28, 1999
591 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1999)

Opinion

No. CX-98-2406.

Dated: April 28, 1999.

David R. Vail, Soderberg Vail, L.L.C., for relator.

Jon K. Murphy, Asst. Atty. Gen., David L. Christianson, Arthur, Chapman, Ketterling, Smetak Pikala, for respondents.

Wilbur W. Fluegel, Wentzel Fluegel, for amicus Minnesota Trial Lawyers Ass'n.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 1, 1998, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minnesota Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure 136.01, subdivision 1 (b).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Russell A. Anderson, Associate Justice.


Summaries of

Scott v. Greater Anoka Cty. Humane Society

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 28, 1999
591 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1999)
Case details for

Scott v. Greater Anoka Cty. Humane Society

Case Details

Full title:Bret A. Scott, Relator, v. Greater Anoka County Humane Society and MN…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Apr 28, 1999

Citations

591 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1999)