From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 5, 2019
Case No. 3:18-CV-171 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 5, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:18-CV-171

09-05-2019

MARK A. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 18), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 17), REVERSING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY FINDING, REMANDING THE MATTER TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION, AND TERMINATING THIS CASE

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 18) filed by the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman's Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 17). Magistrate Judge Newman recommended that the Administrative Law Judge's non-disability finding be found unsupported by substantial evidence in the record and reversed. Magistrate Judge Newman further recommended that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report. The Commissioner filed Objections (Doc. 18) to the Report, in response to which Plaintiff Mark A. Scott filed a Response (Doc. 19). This matter is ripe for review.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that the Commissioner's Objections (Doc. 18) to the Report (Doc. 17) are not well-taken and are hereby OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS, in full, the Report (Doc. 17) and rules as follows:

1. The Administrative Law Judge's non-disability finding is unsupported by substantial evidence and REVERSED;

2. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with this Order and with the Report; and

3. This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Thursday, September 5, 2019.

s/Thomas M. Rose

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Scott v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 5, 2019
Case No. 3:18-CV-171 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 5, 2019)
Case details for

Scott v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Sep 5, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:18-CV-171 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 5, 2019)

Citing Cases

Kilgore v. Saul

"Courts have found error where . . . an ALJ fails to address a medical source's opinion regarding both the…

Jones v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

“In other words, [t]he [RFC] opinions of treating physicians, consultative physicians, and medical experts…