From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. City of Heflin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 14, 2017
Case No.: 1:14-cv-02484-VEH (N.D. Ala. Nov. 14, 2017)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:14-cv-02484-VEH

11-14-2017

CONSTANCE SCOTT, Plaintiff v. CITY OF HEFLIN, ALEX JACOBS BENEFIELD, and ERIC SCOTT WINSLETTT, Defendants


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 29, 2017, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation and allowed the parties therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No party filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants be granted and this action dismissed with prejudice.

The court will enter a separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion.

DONE and ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2017.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Scott v. City of Heflin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 14, 2017
Case No.: 1:14-cv-02484-VEH (N.D. Ala. Nov. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Scott v. City of Heflin

Case Details

Full title:CONSTANCE SCOTT, Plaintiff v. CITY OF HEFLIN, ALEX JACOBS BENEFIELD, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 14, 2017

Citations

Case No.: 1:14-cv-02484-VEH (N.D. Ala. Nov. 14, 2017)