From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2006
No. CIV S-03-0545 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-0545 FCD KJM P.

February 2, 2006


ORDER


On December 5, 2005, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, or a statement of non-opposition, to defendants' December 5, 2005 motion for summary judgment. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Scott v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2006
No. CIV S-03-0545 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Scott v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. TOM L. CAREY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-0545 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2006)